Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41322932›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Secondary Spontaneous Pneumothorax in Asthma: A Dancing Gorilla Moment.

Maria Kent, Bijaya Prajapati, Christopher Isles

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria KentGeneral Internal Medicine, Dumfries and Galloway Royal Infirmary, Dumfries, GBR.
Bijaya PrajapatiRespiratory Medicine, Dumfries and Galloway Royal Infirmary, Dumfries, GBR.
Christopher IslesAcute Internal Medicine, Dumfries and Galloway Royal Infirmary, Dumfries, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This report describes how cognitive bias contributed to a delay in diagnosing secondary spontaneous pneumothorax in a patient with asthma. A female in her 70s with a past history of asthma presented with shortness of breath at rest and chest pain. She was treated for an acute asthma exacerbation but did not respond as expected. With failure to improve overnight, a review of the chest X-ray revealed a right-sided pneumothorax that had not been previously recognised. This case illustrates how clinicians' susceptibility to cognitive biases and perceptual errors can affect patient care. It highlights the importance of a systematic approach to interpreting imaging and considering an alternative diagnosis when patients respond poorly to conventional treatment.

Indexed as

acute medicineasthmacase reportcognitive biasimaginginattentional blindnessrespiratory medicinesatisfaction of searchspontaneous pneumothorax

Identifiers

PMID41322932
PMCPMC12663753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.