ArticleCureus2025
Bridging the Gap in Medical Education: A Qualitative Study on the Perspectives of Japanese Medical Students and Patients on Outcomes-Based Education.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOutcomes-based education (OBE) has transformed medical education by focusing on specific, measurable learning results. However, educators typically formulate these outcomes with little regard for the perspectives of key stakeholders, such as students and patients. This study explored the perceptions of Japanese medical students and patients regarding these outcomes.
methodsWe conducted focus group interviews with 14 medical students and 13 patients from the first author's university. Participants reflected on the eight outcomes of the 2010 edition of the Model Core Curriculum for Medical Education in Japan. Qualitative data analysis was conducted using thematic analysis.
resultsMedical students emphasized the importance of practical education, patient interaction early in their training, and education that bridges knowledge and action, questioning the effectiveness of traditional teaching methods related to professionalism and communication skills. The students also expressed dissatisfaction with simulated learning for team care. In contrast, patients stressed the importance of physicians' empathy and communication skills alongside a patient-centered research approach. They also expressed a desire for a range of ways in which physicians respond to patients as individuals.
conclusionThe study results have significant implications for outcomes-based medical education. Both medical students and patients questioned the efficacy of the traditional curriculum, notably in teaching professionalism, communication skills, and team care. The findings suggest that medical education outcomes for future physicians should integrate practical application, empathy training, and flexibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.