ArticleCureus2025
Detection of Acute Tropical Fever Pathogens via Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction: A Cross-Sectional Study to Guide Appropriate Antimicrobial Use in Communities.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPakistan faces a substantial burden of tropical diseases, including malaria, dengue, and typhoid fever, particularly in Sindh Province, where recent outbreaks and floods have further increased disease incidence, highlighting the urgent need for improved diagnostics and disease control. Currently, diagnosis relies on multiple laboratory tests, contributing to frequent empirical antimicrobial use due to many undiagnosed or misdiagnosed cases. This study aimed to validate a rapid molecular test for the early diagnosis of malaria, dengue, and typhoid infections, thereby facilitating targeted therapy and reducing empirical antimicrobial use.
methodsPatients aged three months or older who presented to Aga Khan Hospital clinical laboratories with fever lasting two to seven days were recruited. From a total of 1,123 collected blood samples, 400 were randomly selected for multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing. Multiplex PCR was performed alongside standard blood tests for malaria, dengue, and typhoid. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of PCR were calculated and compared with routine tests. Data analysis was conducted using STATA 17.0 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas).
resultsAmong the 1,123 samples collected over one year, 400 blood samples were randomly selected for molecular testing. Of these, 211 were PCR positive. The sensitivity for detecting malaria was 92.4%, specificity was 98.4%, and the positive and negative predictive values were 90.7% and 98.6%, respectively. The specificity of PCR for dengue and typhoid was 94.6% and 93%, respectively; however, the sensitivity for both dengue and typhoid was low (35.3% and 25%, respectively).
conclusionWhile multiplex PCR demonstrates high accuracy in detecting malaria, its limited sensitivity for dengue and typhoid highlights the need for more advanced molecular assays. Developing rapid and reliable diagnostic tests is essential to enable targeted treatment and promote antimicrobial stewardship within the community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.