ArticleCureus2025
Prognostic Utility of the Dublin-Boston Score for Short-Term Clinical Outcomes in Moderate-to-Severe COVID-19: A Cohort Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Amid the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the rapid increase in positive cases strained healthcare capacity, leading to shortages of ICU beds and ventilators. As the disease process was new, physicians faced significant challenges in clinical decision-making, such as determining when to escalate care, consider mechanical ventilation, and other management therapies. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is the major proinflammatory cytokine that is responsible for "cytokine storm," and interleukin-10 (IL-10) is an anti-inflammatory cytokine. The Dublin-Boston score (DBS) was introduced to track the trend of these interleukin levels, which helps predict the prognosis of patients with moderate to severe illnesses and guides clinical decision-making. Objective To predict the clinical outcome in moderate to severe COVID-19 patients based on the ratio of IL-6 to IL-10 by using the DBS. Methodology This is a prospective cohort study done in 39 moderate-to-severely ill adult COVID-19 patients confirmed by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The longitudinal changes in cytokines, IL-6, IL-10, and the IL-6:IL-10 ratio on day one and day four of admission were measured. Clinical outcome is assessed by using the WHO-Clinical Progression Scale (WHO-CPS). Results are capped between -2 to +2. The relationship between the IL-6:IL-10 ratio and clinical outcome is assessed by using the formula: DBS = Δ(IL-6: IL-10) × 2. Analyses were conducted in IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24 (Released 2016; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States); two-sided tests with significance set at p<0.01. Associations between the DBS and WHO-CPS were examined. Results Among 39 patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 (24 declined by day four), the change in IL-6:IL-10 captured by the DBS strongly predicted short-term outcome. In a DBS-only logistic model, each one-point increase in DBS was associated with higher odds of decline (OR = 8.00), with excellent discrimination (AUC = 1.000) and low error (Brier = 0.019). Calibration indicated systematic over-prediction (intercept = 0.516; slope = 0.132). DBS outperformed single-analyte IL-6 (AUC: day four = 0.785; day one = 0.314). An adjusted model (DBS + age + sex) retained a large effect (OR = 8.57). WHO-CPS categories showed no significant distributional differences across DBS outcomes (χ² = 4.26, p = 0.119), but combining WHO-CPS with DBS preserved excellent discrimination with a similar calibration pattern. Conclusions In hospitalized patients with moderate-severe COVID-19, the DBS may be predictive of short-term clinical deterioration and may provide incremental prognostic information beyond IL-6 alone; confirmation in larger cohorts is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.