Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41322801›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Daily Text-Message Retrieval Practice for Pediatric Residents.

Adin Nelson, Molly Broder, Alan Schwartz, Charlene Thomas, Erika Abramson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adin NelsonPediatrics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA.
Molly BroderPediatrics, BronxCare Health System, New York, USA.
Alan SchwartzMedical Education, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Charlene ThomasBiostatistics, Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA.
Erika AbramsonPediatrics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective Residents have limited time and much to learn. This creates an inescapable time pressure, which encourages reliance on efficient and effective learning strategies. Retrieval practice - study strategies such as flashcards and practice questions that demand active recall of desired information - is an increasingly common learning strategy for medical trainees. Growing evidence has linked retrieval practice to improved learning outcomes, but it has primarily come from small, observational studies, and their methods have varied widely. The variability in the existing literature makes it difficult to synthesize the evidence and identify best practices. We designed a national, prospective study to test the effects of daily retrieval practice for pediatric residents. Methods We recruited a national sample of pediatric residents in the United States. We sent participating residents mass text messages every morning for a year, directing them to answer one exam-style, multiple-choice, retrieval practice question. We then compared residents' scores on national standardized exams at the beginning and end of the study period, and we compared scores between participating residents and a control group of residents not enrolled in the study. Results A total of 293 residents enrolled in the study. At baseline, their exam scores were no different from control residents' scores. The daily mass text messages did not successfully induce residents to answer practice questions; most participants answered very few, and many answered none at all. There was no significant difference between participating residents' and control residents' exam scores, and there was no significant correlation between the number of questions participants answered and the change in their exam scores. Conclusions Previous observational studies have shown that the more exam-style practice questions residents answer, the better they score on subsequent exams. Small studies have also found that text message reminders encouraged residents to answer more practice questions and boosted their exam performance. In this large, national, prospective study, however, we found that daily text messages were not effective, and we were therefore unable to test how answering practice questions might have impacted residents' annual standardized exam scores. Previous studies of text message retrieval practice may have missed or undervalued key elements of the text messaging programs that did not scale effectively to a national intervention. Future studies should explore effective strategies for increasing residents' engagement with practice questions and other forms of retrieval practice.

Indexed as

educationexam preparationgraduate medical educationlearningresidencyretrieval practice

Identifiers

PMID41322801
PMCPMC12658869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.