ArticleCureus2025
Development of a Falls Efficacy Scale: A Contextually Relevant and Appropriate Tool for Indian Seniors.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction India is expected to have one of the largest elderly populations in the world by 2050, with approximately 20% of the total population projected to be senior citizens. Currently, fall efficacy scales do not include all the relevant activities, and some daily activities performed by seniors at risk of falls are not included in them. Therefore, it is important to have a fall risk assessment screening tool that is contextually appropriate for the Indian elderly population. Methodology A literature review, opinions from eight multidisciplinary experts and an interview with 104 senior participants were held. Based on this, the activities performed by seniors at risk of falls were identified. Consensus among experts was sought in finalising the items, and then the scale was pilot-tested with seniors. Results A total of 22 items were pooled, comprising 14 items identified through interviews with seniors, three new items suggested by experts, and five items from existing scales. Some items were added with additional conditions. The item-level Content Validity Index (CVI) was between 0.86 and 1, and the full-scale CVI was 0.95. After the pilot testing, 20 items were included in the final scale. Conclusion The newly developed scale is expected to address the current gap of a contextually relevant falls efficacy scale in India. Future studies on test-retest reliability and content validity of the new scale are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.