ArticleCureus2025
Closing the Gap in Osteoporosis Risk Assessment for Smokers and High-Risk Alcohol Users in a General Practitioner (GP) Practice.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective This quality improvement project (QIP) aimed to enhance the identification, management, and documentation of osteoporosis risk among patients aged 50 and above who are both smokers and high-risk alcohol consumers (>14 units/week) in a GP practice. Methods The project was conducted over three cycles using the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) framework. Eligible patients were identified via systematic electronic health record (SystmOne) searches. Interventions included systematic FRAX (Fracture Risk Assessment Tool) scoring for identified high-risk patients, patient contact through text or telephone for those needing further assessment, involvement of practice pharmacist and risk assessment follow-ups, and embedding a FRAX electronic prompt into routine checks at the end. Outcomes measured were FRAX documentation rates, recorded dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) result rates, and documentation of appropriate management of DXA results. We assessed statistical significance using Fisher's exact test. Results A total of 49 patients who smoked and consumed alcohol at high-risk levels met the inclusion criteria. At baseline, only one out of 49 eligible patients (2.05%) had a recorded FRAX score. Following three PDSA cycles, FRAX documentation increased to 50 out of 50 patients (100%) (p<0.001), with one additional patient meeting the inclusion criteria during the course of the project. Of 22 patients requiring DXA, only two (9.09%) had scans at baseline, which increased to 11 (50%) following interventions (p=0.0068). Two (22.2%) of nine patients who needed and had a DXA scan for assessment after interventions had osteoporosis, five (55.6%) osteopenia, and two (22.2%) normal bone density. Interventions were initiated following the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) guidelines. Conclusions This quality improvement initiative showed that systematic changes can improve adherence to osteoporosis prevention measures within a primary care setting. Electronic health record searches and involvement of a multidisciplinary team enabled improvements in both the identification of high-risk patients and their clinical management. However, the single-site setting, limited cohort size, and short follow-up period, as well as dependency on accurate electronic documentation, restrict generalisability. Targeted QI interventions can cause substantial improvements in fragility fracture risk assessment and DXA scanning and preventive measures in high-risk groups within primary care. Embedding prompts in electronic health systems and involving multidisciplinary team members are practical strategies to increase fracture prevention. Future expansion to other risk groups and evaluation of long-term outcomes will be essential to facilitate further improvement in the prevention of fragility fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.