ArticleCureus2025
Comparative Outcomes of Hilar Control in Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Satinsky Clamp Versus Bulldog Clamp.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) is a minimally invasive surgery for treating small renal masses using clamps such as Satinsky clamps, bulldog clamps, and vessel loops to control the renal artery and/or vein, reducing blood loss and improving visibility. This study aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes, including operative time, warm ischemia time, and postoperative recovery, of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy performed using either Satinsky or bulldog clamps for hilar control. Methodology Data from patients who underwent LPN between 2016 and 2022 were collected retrospectively. Hilar control was achieved using either a Satinsky or Bulldog clamp. Operative time, warm ischemia time, number of ports used, and hospital stay duration were compared. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 4.3.1. Results The study included 54 patients who underwent LPN, with a mean age of 57 years. Overall, 61% of the patients were male. Tumors were incidentally detected in 54% and located on the right side in 54%. A laparoscopic Satinsky clamp was used in 31 patients, while a bulldog clamp was used in 23. No significant differences were found between the two groups regarding age, gender, tumor characteristics, T-stage, or RENAL Nephrometry Score (p > 0.05). Warm ischemia time and mean operative time were higher in the bulldog group, but not significantly (p > 0.05). Postoperative stay duration was similar (p = 0.70). The Satinsky group required one additional port. Conclusions Both Satinsky and bulldog clamps offer excellent hilar control during LPN with no statistically significant increase in warm ischemia and operative times. The Satinsky clamp required one additional port, which can be used for specimen retrieval. The choice between clamps is influenced by the surgeon's experience and preference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.