Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41322769›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Trigger-Free Neuraxial Anaesthesia for Emergency Evacuation of Retained Products of Conception in Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Reem AlAamer, Ahmed Alanzi, Dawood Alatefi, Abdulrahman A Alselaiti

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Reem AlAamerAnesthesia and Pain Management, King Hamad University Hospital, Muharraq, BHR.
Ahmed AlanziAnesthesia and Pain Management, King Hamad University Hospital, Muharraq, BHR.
Dawood AlatefiNeurological Surgery, University of Jordan, Amman, JOR.
Abdulrahman A AlselaitiAnesthesia and Pain Management, King Hamad University Hospital, Muharraq, BHR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD) carries anaesthetic risks including anaesthesia-related rhabdomyolysis, hyperkalaemia, and prolonged neuromuscular blockade. Trigger-free techniques that avoid volatile agents and depolarising neuromuscular blockers (NMBs) are preferred. A 31-year-old woman with LGMD presented four days after a second-trimester miscarriage with pain and tissue passage requiring emergency evacuation of retained products of conception (ERPC). Examination showed proximal limb weakness without cardiopulmonary compromise; routine laboratory results were normal. A vapour-free, clean anaesthesia workstation was prepared and succinylcholine/volatile agents strictly avoided. Single-shot spinal anaesthesia (0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 10 mg at L3-4) provided adequate surgical conditions. Intraoperative haemodynamics were stable; no sedatives or NMBs were used. Surgery lasted ~20 minutes. Recovery in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) was uncomplicated with an Aldrete score of 10 and same-day discharge. For urgent gynaecological surgery in LGMD, neuraxial anaesthesia can provide reliable anaesthesia while avoiding recognised triggers of rhabdomyolysis and hyperkalaemia. Meticulous preoperative planning (vapour-free machine, avoidance of depolarising agents, and ready total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) backup) supports safety in this population.

Indexed as

evacuation of retained products of conceptionlimb-girdle muscular dystrophyneuraxial anaesthesiaobstetric and gynaecologic surgeryspinal anaesthesiatrigger-free anaesthesia

Identifiers

PMID41322769
PMCPMC12664663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.