Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41322763›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Computed Tomography Coronary Angiogram as a First-Line Diagnostic Tool in Pregnancy-Associated Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: A Case Report of Left Main Stem and Left Anterior Descending Artery Dissection at 35 Weeks' Gestation.

Kiran Sheikh, Sara Ali, Divya Gunesh

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kiran SheikhCardiology, William Harvey Hospital, Kent, GBR.
Sara AliCardiology, William Harvey Hospital, Kent, GBR.
Divya GuneshCardiology, William Harvey Hospital, Kent, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an uncommon cause of acute myocardial infarction, typically affecting younger individuals without traditional risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The underlying pathophysiology differs entirely from that of atherosclerotic myocardial infarction, necessitating distinct diagnostic and management strategies. When SCAD occurs during pregnancy, it is termed pregnancy-associated SCAD (P-SCAD). Because of its rarity, no standardized guidelines currently exist for the diagnosis and management of P-SCAD. We report the case of a 37-year-old woman at 35 weeks' gestation, with no traditional atherosclerotic risk factors, who presented with chest pain. Her electrocardiogram (ECG) showed subtle changes suggestive of anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Considering the procedural risks associated with an invasive coronary angiogram, a computed tomography (CT) coronary angiogram was performed first, confirming dissection involving the left main stem and proximal left anterior descending (LAD) artery. She experienced a brief episode of pulmonary edema that responded well to furosemide and subsequently remained hemodynamically stable. The patient was monitored in the hospital and later delivered uneventfully about four weeks after the event. This case highlights the value of CT coronary angiogram as a non-invasive diagnostic option in hemodynamically stable antepartum patients with suspected SCAD, providing a safe alternative to invasive angiography in selected cases.

Indexed as

conservative managementct coronary angiographymyocardial infarction in pregnancyrisks of invasive angiogramspontaneous coronary artery dissection

Identifiers

PMID41322763
PMCPMC12661094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.