ReviewCureus2025
Harm From Foreign Body Ingestion in Adults and Children: A Systematic Review of Case Reports.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Intestinal perforation secondary to ingested chicken bone: case report and literature review.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intentional and accidental foreign body ingestion is a common presentation seen in emergency medicine, with clinical characteristics and patterns in intentional and accidental foreign body ingestion in adult and paediatric populations being well documented in some foreign body groups, but not others. We conducted a systematic review of case reports and case series from EMBASE, Medline/PubMed, and CINAHL/Ebsco. Of 783 relevant papers, 199 were retrieved after screening, with 120 included in the final analysis. Cases involving magnets and batteries were excluded due to well-documented risks. A wide variety of harms were found, from a relatively small number of foreign body types, notably toothpicks, coins, medication blister packs, and fishbones. Characteristic patterns were found relating to age and type of foreign body ingested, and site of complications. Many injuries occurred distal to the diaphragm, not just above it. Fatal outcomes were described in both intentional and accidental ingestion. We concluded that foreign body ingestion can cause harm in multiple locations throughout the gastrointestinal tract. Clinical patterns vary with patient age and object characteristics. Passage beyond the diaphragm should not provide reassurance, as significant complications may still occur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.