Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41322680›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence reports2025

Preferences for harm reduction vending machine design among rural people who use drugs.

April M Young, Tasfia Jahangir, Susan Westneat, Chelsi Cheatom, Amanda Fallin-Bennett, Laura C Fanucchi, Patricia R Freeman, Jennifer R Havens, Hannah K Knudsen, Kathryn E McCollister and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05657106 (Kentucky Outreach Service Kiosk), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05657106 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Kentucky Outreach Service Kiosk (KyOSK): Addressing Health Needs and Improving Service Linkage in Rural Appalachia Through Health Kiosks

TypeinterventionalSponsorApril M YoungRan2023 to 2027Enrolled752ConditionsOpioid-Related Disorders, Hepatitis C (HCV), Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Drug OverdoseArmsHealth kiosk
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

April M YoungDepartment of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY, United States.
Tasfia JahangirDepartment of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia.
Susan WestneatDepartment of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY, United States.
Chelsi CheatomTrac-B Exchange, Las Vegas NV, Las Vegas, NV, United States.
Amanda Fallin-BennettCollege of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.
Laura C FanucchiCenter on Drug and Alcohol Research, Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States.
Patricia R FreemanCenter on Drug and Alcohol Research, Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States.
Jennifer R HavensCenter on Drug and Alcohol Research, Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States.
Hannah K KnudsenCenter on Drug and Alcohol Research, Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States.
Kathryn E McCollisterDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Susannah StitzerDepartment of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY, United States.
Jack StonePopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Peter VickermanPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Melvin D LivingstonDepartment of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia.

Funding

Examining the Impact of the Twin Epidemics of Methamphetamine and Opioid Use on Overdose, Risky Sex and Treatment Engagement among PWUD in Two Rural Appalachian CohortsR01DA033862 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI Jennifer R Havens · 2012 to 2026
$6.9M
Kentucky Outreach Service Kiosk (KyOSK): Reducing Overdose, Hepatitis C, and Other Drug-related Risks in Rural Appalachia through Health KiosksR01DA055872 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI April Marie Young · 2022 to 2026
$2.9M
Social networks and HIV risk among rural drug usersR01DA024598 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HAVENS, JENNIFER R · 2008 to 2012
$2.6M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA024598NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA033862NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA055872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, harm reduction vending machines (HRVMs) have been used for decades to dispense safe injection equipment and other supplies to people who use drugs (PWUD). However, HRVMs have only recently scaled up in the U.S. and few operate in rural settings. This study describes preferences for HRVM design among rural PWUD in two Appalachian Kentucky communities. Peer-referral and outreach were used to recruit participants (n = 731). Eligibility criteria were ≥ 18 years, residing in the target counties, and having used any drug (excluding alcohol, cannabis, and tobacco) to get high within 6 months. Interviewer-administered questionnaires elicited data on behavioral/demographic characteristics and HRVM design preferences. Sample characteristics and site-level differences were estimated accounting for peer-referral chain clustering. Naloxone was the most desired supply (95.6 %), followed by syringes (94.5 %) and fentanyl test strips (83.7 %). Supplies for basic needs were popular, including water (82.6 %), food (72.8 %), and personal care kits (71.3 %). The most endorsed location was the health department (71.1 %). More than twice the number of participants wanted HRVMs installed outdoors (52.3 %) rather than indoors (19.6 %), but for 25.4 %, indoor/outdoor installation preference varies depending on the venue. While over three-quarters reported that a surveillance camera would not affect their HRVM use, a substantial minority indicated it would be a deterrent, highlighting a key consideration for implementation. There were significant differences in supply and location preferences across the two communities. HRVMs may expand harm reduction service access in rural settings, but PWUD input is needed to ensure that their design responds to community needs. Clinical Trials Registration NCT05657106.

Indexed as

AppalachiaHarm reductionInjection drug usePeople who inject drugsRuralSubstance useVending machine

Identifiers

PMID41322680
PMCPMC12664582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.