ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence reports2025
Preferences for harm reduction vending machine design among rural people who use drugs.
Article in Drug and alcohol dependence reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05657106 (Kentucky Outreach Service Kiosk), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Kentucky Outreach Service Kiosk (KyOSK): Addressing Health Needs and Improving Service Linkage in Rural Appalachia Through Health Kiosks
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harm Reduction Vending Machines in Supportive Housing for Veterans.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Exploring Perspectives About Public Health Vending Machine Implementation on an American Indian Reservation in the Northern Midwest, United States.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Globally, harm reduction vending machines (HRVMs) have been used for decades to dispense safe injection equipment and other supplies to people who use drugs (PWUD). However, HRVMs have only recently scaled up in the U.S. and few operate in rural settings. This study describes preferences for HRVM design among rural PWUD in two Appalachian Kentucky communities. Peer-referral and outreach were used to recruit participants (n = 731). Eligibility criteria were ≥ 18 years, residing in the target counties, and having used any drug (excluding alcohol, cannabis, and tobacco) to get high within 6 months. Interviewer-administered questionnaires elicited data on behavioral/demographic characteristics and HRVM design preferences. Sample characteristics and site-level differences were estimated accounting for peer-referral chain clustering. Naloxone was the most desired supply (95.6 %), followed by syringes (94.5 %) and fentanyl test strips (83.7 %). Supplies for basic needs were popular, including water (82.6 %), food (72.8 %), and personal care kits (71.3 %). The most endorsed location was the health department (71.1 %). More than twice the number of participants wanted HRVMs installed outdoors (52.3 %) rather than indoors (19.6 %), but for 25.4 %, indoor/outdoor installation preference varies depending on the venue. While over three-quarters reported that a surveillance camera would not affect their HRVM use, a substantial minority indicated it would be a deterrent, highlighting a key consideration for implementation. There were significant differences in supply and location preferences across the two communities. HRVMs may expand harm reduction service access in rural settings, but PWUD input is needed to ensure that their design responds to community needs. Clinical Trials Registration NCT05657106.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.