ReviewPNAS nexus2025
Long-term optical monitoring of genetically encoded fluorescent indicators.
Review in PNAS nexus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Circadian modulation of spontaneous dopamine release shapes reward-evoked signaling in the nucleus accumbens.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the past several decades, genetically encoded fluorescent indicators have revolutionized neuroscience by enabling cell-type-specific optical recording of neural activity. While most applications have focused on brain regions where stimulus-evoked activity correlates with behavior on the scale of seconds to minutes, many fundamental behavioral and physiological processes such as feeding, thermoregulation, and circadian timekeeping occur over hours to weeks. However, adapting optical recording techniques to these longer timescales presents unique challenges, particularly in accurately measuring and interpreting neural activity across extended recording durations. As a result, even studies using similar data have reached divergent conclusions, largely due to differences in data analysis and interpretation. This lack of standardization risks misinterpretation, miscommunication, and reduced reproducibility. In this article, we focus on in vivo fiber photometry calcium imaging in circadian neuroscience research as a case study. We review the current literature, outline theoretical, and practical challenges, and offer perspectives for optimizing experimental approaches and standardizing data interpretation. Importantly, the fundamental principles of long-term optical recording extend beyond circadian research and apply broadly to brain circuits that govern behavior and physiology over days to weeks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.