ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025
PPG-based biometric authentication: A review on architectures, datasets, attacks and security challenges.
Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Powered Wearable and Portable Devices for Remote Cardiac Care and Population Health.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- User Authentication Using Inner-Wrist Skin Prints: Feasibility and Performance Assessment with Off-the-Shelf Fingerprint Sensor.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent Photoplethysmography (PPG-based) authentication approaches are emerging as promising biometric modalities, driven by the widespread adoption of wearable devices capable of noninvasive and continuous identity verification. These advances have also introduced new challenges and threats to security. This review presents a taxonomy of PPG-based authentication and identification systems, emphasizing a comparative analysis of different authentication models using PPG signals, in terms of performance, preprocessing algorithms, sensors and hardware platforms, as well as security. The lack of standardized datasets, which limits reproducibility and generalization across demographics and real-world conditions, is discussed. Unlike other studies, this work focuses on the impact and mitigation strategies of the main attacks, such as spoofing, replay, and presentation, in PPG-based authentication systems. Additionally, based on the gaps and challenges identified, a security analysis is presented, emphasizing standardized metrics such as False Acceptance Rate (FAR), False Rejection Rate (FRR), and Equal Error Rate (EER), and a dataset standardization for scalability. Finally, this research highlights new challenges and future work, such as the integration of robust ML architectures with standardized datasets and security evaluations to enable reliable PPG-based authentication systems in real-world applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.