ArticlePreventive medicine reports2025
Reducing heat risks for the elderly by rescheduling healthcare appointments in Germany.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Intensifying heatwaves pose severe health risks for elderly individuals, particularly during healthcare appointments scheduled in hot periods. We aimed to investigate if shifting consultation times or rescheduling elderly patients may mitigate heat-related risks and if healthcare providers and patients are open to do so. Methods: We analyzed 17,619,866 consultation hours from 90,977 German healthcare providers during summer 2024, linking them with weather data to investigate heat-related risks. Simulations tested the effects of advancing, postponing, and mixed scheduling strategies. Additionally, surveys with 459 healthcare providers and 259 elderly patients assessed rescheduling practices, attitudes, and acceptance. Results: Analyses revealed that 15 % of consultations occurred under caution-level and 1 % under extreme caution-level heat conditions, with risk peaking in afternoon hours. Simulations showed that advancing morning and postponing afternoon consultations significantly reduced unsafe heat exposure. While 59 % of practices could theoretically accommodate all elderly patients before 11 am, few were doing so. Provider-initiated rescheduling was rare but more likely among those recognizing heat risks. Patient surveys revealed strong acceptance of rescheduling, particularly to morning hours. Conclusions: Rescheduling healthcare appointments offers a feasible strategy to reduce heat risks for elderly patients. Increasing provider awareness may foster proactive rescheduling practices, enhancing patient protection during heatwaves.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.