Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41322657›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2025

A rodent model of enhanced anticipation of positive events: sex-specific modifications in cognitive bias and emotional resilience.

Sarah C Hartvigsen, Megan Hooper, Olivia Harding, Evelyn Barringer, Isabel DiLandro, Aditya Narayanan, Brendan Crockett, Yulia Shatalov, Isabella Tomé, Paean Luby and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sarah C HartvigsenDepartment of Psychology, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA, United States.
Megan HooperDepartment of Psychology, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA, United States.
Olivia HardingDepartment of Psychology, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA, United States.
Evelyn BarringerDepartment of Psychology, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA, United States.
Isabel DiLandroDepartment of Psychology, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA, United States.
Aditya NarayananDepartment of Psychology, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA, United States.
Brendan CrockettDepartment of Psychology, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA, United States.
Yulia ShatalovDepartment of Psychology, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA, United States.
Isabella ToméDepartment of Psychology, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA, United States.
Paean LubyDepartment of Psychology, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA, United States.
Braden WixtedDepartment of Psychology, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA, United States.
Molly KentDepartment of Biology, Virginia Military Institute, Lexington, VA, United States.
Kelly LambertDepartment of Psychology, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While it is known that chronic unpredictable stress and negative events adversely affect neurobiological outcomes, much less is known regarding the neurobiological impact of positive emotions such as chronic anticipation of appetitive events. From a translational perspective, an enhanced understanding of the impact of extended exposure to positive emotions may provide novel insights into effective non-pharmacological, behavior-based approaches to enhance mental resilience. Here, we investigate a novel rodent model of chronic Unpredictable Positive Event Response (UPER) training in male and female Long Evans rats to examine behavioral, neural, and endocrine effects of enhanced anticipation of positive events. Rats were exposed to either 3 weeks of daily, randomly administered, cued positive events (UPER training) or exposure to the same positive events administered at the same time (i.e., in a predictable manner) each day to control for anticipation (Enriched Control Training; ENR). Following UPER and ENR training, rats were assessed for cognitive bias, exploratory behaviors, and persistence in a Cognitive Bias Assessment paradigm, Novelty-Suppressed Feeding Task, and an Unattainable Puzzle Reward Task, respectively. In the Cognitive Bias Assessment, a trend for UPER-trained males to respond with an optimistic bias was observed. A main effect of training was observed in the Unattainable Puzzle Reward Task, with UPER-trained rats exhibiting reduced latency to interact with the novel object. A sex-dependent latency to consume a food reward in a Novelty-Suppressed Feeding Task was also seen. Focusing on fecal corticosterone metabolite (FCM) levels following anticipation-enhanced versus anticipation-minimized training, UPER-trained rats exhibited a trend for lower levels than ENR-trained rats. No c-fos activation differences were observed between the groups. Overall, these preliminary findings suggest that anticipation for positive events may have sex-specific effects on emotional responses to uncertain events. Accordingly, further research may determine relevance of this model in preclinical models of psychiatric diseases.

Indexed as

anticipationcognitive biasemotional regulationpositive eventssex differences

Identifiers

PMID41322657
PMCPMC12657492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.