Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41322530›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

Understanding Porosity Loss in MOF Pelletization: Intrinsic vs Extrinsic Mechanical Stability in Zn-MOF-74.

Ashley L Sutton, Muhammad Munir Sadiq, Michael T Scalzo, Aaron Seeber, Stephanie A Bird, Kristina Konstas, James I Mardel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ashley L SuttonManufacturing, CSIRO, Private Bag 33, Clayton South Melbourne, Victoria 3169 Australia.
Muhammad Munir SadiqManufacturing, CSIRO, Private Bag 33, Clayton South Melbourne, Victoria 3169 Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5326-6158
Michael T ScalzoDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, Victoria 3168 Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2710-2774
Aaron SeeberManufacturing, CSIRO, Private Bag 33, Clayton South Melbourne, Victoria 3169 Australia.
Stephanie A BirdAustralian Synchrotron, 800 Blackburn Road, Clayton, Melbourne, Victoria 3168, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6801-1441
Kristina KonstasManufacturing, CSIRO, Private Bag 33, Clayton South Melbourne, Victoria 3169 Australia.
James I MardelManufacturing, CSIRO, Private Bag 33, Clayton South Melbourne, Victoria 3169 Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are highly studied materials for gas storage and separation, with increasing interest in their application in industrial settings. Industrial processes typically require MOFs to be shaped into robust pellets. Unfortunately, pelletization processing can often result in significant loss in porosity and/or performance. This research examines the mechanical origins of such degradation using Zn-MOF-74 as a model system. A combination of high-pressure single-crystal X-ray diffraction (HP-SCXRD), periodic density functional theory (DFT), powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), and nitrogen sorption measurements was undertaken to evaluate the mechanical response of Zn-MOF-74 under both hydrostatic (ideal) and uniaxial (practical) stress. SCXRD and DFT show that Zn-MOF-74 remains crystalline under isotropic compression beyond 2.8 GPa, yielding a bulk modulus of ∼15 GPa, confirming significant intrinsic stability under hydrostatic pressure. In contrast, uniaxial pelletization at pressures as low as 0.08-0.77 GPa results in an increasing reduction of BET surface area and microstrain. This difference can be attributed to extrinsic effects, including shear-induced microstructural damage and particle fragmentation. The shear yield strength, estimated empirically from the shear modulus, is only 0.16-0.50 GPa, consistent with the onset of degradation during pressing. These findings reveal the crucial role of nonhydrostatic stress in MOF shaping and demonstrate that bulk modulus alone is insufficient to predict mechanical resilience during pelletization. Strategies such as hydrostatic compaction, binder-assisted shaping, or solvation during pressing have the potential to mitigate porosity loss. This work provides a mechanistic understanding of how to improve MOF processability through both material and engineering solutions.

Identifiers

PMID41322530
PMCPMC12658601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.