ArticleACS omega2025
Understanding Porosity Loss in MOF Pelletization: Intrinsic vs Extrinsic Mechanical Stability in Zn-MOF-74.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Silk-Nano-Fibroin Aerogels: A Bio-Derived, Amine-Rich Platform for Rapid and Reversible COACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026Article
- Concept of 2D van der Waals Nanohybrids for Key Biomedical Applications.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are highly studied materials for gas storage and separation, with increasing interest in their application in industrial settings. Industrial processes typically require MOFs to be shaped into robust pellets. Unfortunately, pelletization processing can often result in significant loss in porosity and/or performance. This research examines the mechanical origins of such degradation using Zn-MOF-74 as a model system. A combination of high-pressure single-crystal X-ray diffraction (HP-SCXRD), periodic density functional theory (DFT), powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), and nitrogen sorption measurements was undertaken to evaluate the mechanical response of Zn-MOF-74 under both hydrostatic (ideal) and uniaxial (practical) stress. SCXRD and DFT show that Zn-MOF-74 remains crystalline under isotropic compression beyond 2.8 GPa, yielding a bulk modulus of ∼15 GPa, confirming significant intrinsic stability under hydrostatic pressure. In contrast, uniaxial pelletization at pressures as low as 0.08-0.77 GPa results in an increasing reduction of BET surface area and microstrain. This difference can be attributed to extrinsic effects, including shear-induced microstructural damage and particle fragmentation. The shear yield strength, estimated empirically from the shear modulus, is only 0.16-0.50 GPa, consistent with the onset of degradation during pressing. These findings reveal the crucial role of nonhydrostatic stress in MOF shaping and demonstrate that bulk modulus alone is insufficient to predict mechanical resilience during pelletization. Strategies such as hydrostatic compaction, binder-assisted shaping, or solvation during pressing have the potential to mitigate porosity loss. This work provides a mechanistic understanding of how to improve MOF processability through both material and engineering solutions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.