Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41322526›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

Effect of Molecular Descriptors on the Development of Machine Learning Models for the Prediction of Yield Sooting Index.

Quan-De Wang, Lan Du, Qian Yao, Jinhu Liang, Bi-Yao Wang, Ping Zeng, Zu-Xi Xia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Quan-De WangJiangsu Key Laboratory of Coal-Based Greenhouse Gas Control and Utilization, Carbon Neutrality Institute and School of Chemical Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3941-0192
Lan DuAviation Fuel and Chemical Airworthiness Certification Centre of CAAC, The Second Research Institute of CAAC, Chengdu 610041, People's Republic of China.
Qian YaoCollege of Energy and Power Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, People's Republic of China.
Jinhu LiangSchool of Environmental and Safety Engineering, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3972-7664
Bi-Yao WangAviation Fuel and Chemical Airworthiness Certification Centre of CAAC, The Second Research Institute of CAAC, Chengdu 610041, People's Republic of China.
Ping ZengAviation Fuel and Chemical Airworthiness Certification Centre of CAAC, The Second Research Institute of CAAC, Chengdu 610041, People's Republic of China.
Zu-Xi XiaAviation Fuel and Chemical Airworthiness Certification Centre of CAAC, The Second Research Institute of CAAC, Chengdu 610041, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6218-667X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sooting propensity is a critical property to estimate the combustion efficiency and pollution emissions of a fuel and also to discover the next generation of cleaner and more efficient fuels. Yield sooting index (YSI) is an important metric to characterize the sooting propensity; however, it is inefficient to measure this experimentally. Thus, the development of machine learning (ML)-based predictive models exists as an important instrument to predict the YSI for fuel design. Herein, this work compares the accuracies and interpretability of four ML models to predict the YSI based on different kinds of descriptors. It is demonstrated that the developed best ML models using different kinds of descriptors are different. The multilayer perceptron (MLP) regressor neural network (NN), gradient boosting (GB), and random forest (RF) models are the best models for the PaDEL, mordred, and quantum mechanical (QM) descriptors, respectively. The NN model is suitable for the combination of QM descriptors with full PaDEL and mordred descriptors, while the RF model is better for the combination of QM descriptors with PaDEL and mordred descriptors after the permutation feature importance (PFI) filtering procedure. The usage of QM descriptors can slightly improve the deep-learning-based ML model performance. The developed ML models can all predict the YSI with high accuracy, i.e., the coefficient of determination (

Identifiers

PMID41322526
PMCPMC12658645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.