ReviewACS omega2025
Understanding the Chemical Characteristics of Payloads and the Expression of Tumor-Associated Antigens of ADCs in Clinical Development.
Review in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Antibody-drug conjugate engineering: from design to efficacy and safety.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have become one of the most promising therapeutic strategies for the treatment of cancer. This family of agents is composed of an antibody, a cytotoxic drug, and a linker that conjugates the drug to the antibody. The optimization of each component can potentially improve clinical activity and reduce the toxicity profile. In this article, we collected data from public sources regarding all ADCs that are currently in clinical development and extracted information for payload chemical characteristics, antibody, and linker type. In addition, we also evaluated data from genomic data sets to explore the expression of the tumor-associated antigen (TAA) in nontransformed tissue compared with the tumor. We evaluated 121 ADCs in clinical development. The most frequent targets included ERBB2, followed by FOLR1 and EGFR. 73% of ADCs used cleavable linkers, and only 14% were noncleavable, with 13% considered as undisclosed. While analyzing the physicochemical characteristics using established rules, we observed that 86% of the payloads violated the Lipinski rules, 11% violated Ghose rules, and 42% violated Brenk rules. Only three payloads did not violate any rule: deruxtecan, exatecan, and SN38, all from the camptothecin family. Regarding the conjugation type, only trastuzumab deruxtecan, labetuzumab govitecan, sacituzumab govitecan, BYON3521, and SYD1875 used homogeneous conjugation. An interesting observation was that for some ADCs, TAA expression was higher in normal tissue than in the tumor. In summary, our analysis highlights that only a limited number of ADCs incorporate payloads with favorable physicochemical properties and that several ADCs currently under development target TAAs with higher expression in normal tissues than in the corresponding tumors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.