ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
In-Silico assessment of aortic valve function and mechanics under hypertension.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) is the most common heart valve disorder. While hypertension is a major risk factor, the mechanisms by which elevated blood pressure contributes to calcification are largely unknown. Given the established sensitivity of aortic valve (AV) tissue to mechanical cues, hypertension may subject AV leaflets to a stress state conducive to CAVD. To address this hypothesis, the objective of this study was to compare AV function and mechanics under normotensive (NTN, 120/80 mmHg), pre-hypertensive (preHTN, 125/80 mmHg) and hypertensive (HTN, 130/90 mmHg) conditions using fluid-structure interaction modeling. Methods: AV flow and leaflet dynamics were computed in an idealized aortic root geometry using the arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian approach. Boundary conditions achieving physiologic cardiac output and coronary perfusion, proper leaflet coaptation, and reflecting preHTN and HTN aortic pressure elevations were determined and applied. The fluid wall shear stress (fWSS) on the leaflet fibrosa was analyzed in terms of regional temporal shear magnitude (TSM) and oscillatory shear index (OSI). Leaflet mechanics was characterized in terms of leaflet profile, coaptation angle, and regional tensile stretch (tS) ratios. Results: Hypertensive conditions increased early diastolic flow vorticity and decreased the leaflet coaptation angle in a pressure-dependent manner. PreHTN and HTN subjected all leaflets to fWSS overloads (up to 45% increase in radial TSM vs. NTN). While preHTN and HTN resulted in contrasted radial TSM alterations in the leaflet base (up to 0.6- and 1.3-fold change, respectively, vs. NTN), both conditions caused an increase in radial TSM in the belly and tip regions (up to 1.5-fold increase vs. NTN). Radial fWSS bidirectionality increased in a pressure-dependent manner in the base of the left- and non-coronary leaflets (up to 0.23-point increase in OSI vs. NTN) but was attenuated in the belly region (up to 0.19-point decrease). Hypertension caused a pressure-dependent increase in tS ratio (up to 5% increase vs. NTN) on the left- and non-coronary leaflets. Discussion: Hypertension subjects AV leaflets to complex fluid and structural stress alterations. The results support the existence of a mechano-etiology for CAVD in hypertensive patients and could explain the prevalence of this disease in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.