Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41322475›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025

AI-driven routing pipeline in software-defined networks using DQL: a mini review.

Deepthi Goteti, Vuyyuru Krishna Reddy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Deepthi GotetiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Vijayawada, India.
Vuyyuru Krishna ReddyDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Vijayawada, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

State-of-the-art data center networks are experiencing an increase in dynamic traffic. Even minor inefficiencies cause latency, congestion, and high costs. Software-defined networking (SDN) provides centralized programmability, but classical algorithms such as Dijkstra and Equal-Cost Multi-Path (ECMP) fall short because they cannot adapt in real time. To overcome this limitation, Reinforcement Learning (RL), particularly Q-learning, adds adaptability; however, scalability remains a challenge. DQL addresses this by using neural networks to approximate the Q-function, enabling SDN controllers to learn routing strategies directly from live network states. This Mini Review brings together recent DQL approaches for SDN. We examine architectures, algorithmic variants, and emulation environments (such as Mininet with Ryu). In addition, we introduce a structured taxonomy, with a practice-oriented synthesis of empirical trade-offs and deployment issues. The focus is on trade-offs, throughput, latency, and convergence. Reported studies show that DQL typically improves throughput by about 15-22 percent and reduces delays by roughly 10-12 percent compared with ECMP. These gains, however, come at the cost of longer training, inference delays, and scalability hurdles. Unlike prior surveys, this review makes three distinct contributions: a structured taxonomy, with a practice-oriented synthesis of empirical trade-offs and deployment issues. We also highlight emerging directions: federated learning, graph-based neural models, and explainable AI, which may help transition DQL from promising simulations to production-ready SDN solutions.

Indexed as

deep Q-learningfat-tree topologyintelligent routingquality of servicereinforcement learningsoftware-defined networking

Identifiers

PMID41322475
PMCPMC12657367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.