Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41322466›Full record

ArticleCentral European journal of urology2025

Laser fibers and baskets. How do they affect suction and intrarenal pressures using the novel single-use flexible direct in-scope suction ureteroscopes?

Arman Tsaturyan, Alberto Olivero, Eugenio Ventimiglia, Arkadya Musayelyan, Hayk Grigoryan, Armen Muradyan, Marat Harutyunyan, Evangelos Liatsikos, Panagiotis Kallidonis, Vineet Gauhar and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Central European journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Arman TsaturyanDepartment of Urology, Yerevan State Medical University after Mkhitar Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia.
Alberto OliveroEAU Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group Arnhem, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Eugenio VentimigliaEAU Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group Arnhem, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Arkadya MusayelyanDepartment of Urology, Yerevan State Medical University after Mkhitar Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia.
Hayk GrigoryanDepartment of Urology, Yerevan State Medical University after Mkhitar Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia.
Armen MuradyanDepartment of Urology, Yerevan State Medical University after Mkhitar Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia.
Marat HarutyunyanDepartment of Urology, Erebouni Medical Center, Yerevan, Armenia.
Evangelos LiatsikosAdvancing Suction and Pressure and Innovative Research in Endourology (ASPIRE), Yerevan, Armenia.
Panagiotis KallidonisAdvancing Suction and Pressure and Innovative Research in Endourology (ASPIRE), Yerevan, Armenia.
Vineet GauharAdvancing Suction and Pressure and Innovative Research in Endourology (ASPIRE), Yerevan, Armenia.
Steffi Kar Kei YuenAdvancing Suction and Pressure and Innovative Research in Endourology (ASPIRE), Yerevan, Armenia.
Olivier TraxerAdvancing Suction and Pressure and Innovative Research in Endourology (ASPIRE), Yerevan, Armenia.
Bhaskar SomaniAdvancing Suction and Pressure and Innovative Research in Endourology (ASPIRE), Yerevan, Armenia.
Amelia PietropaoloEAU Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group Arnhem, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: To evaluate intrarenal pressures (IRP) and suction performance of two novel flexible ureteroscopes equipped with a direct-in-scope suction (DISS) feature - the 7.5 Fr PU3033AH and the 9.2 Fr PU400A - both with an empty working channel and with various working instruments inserted. Material and methods: An Results: The highest IRP of 34 mmHg was recorded with the 9.2 Fr scope under 100 mmHg irrigation pressure. Irrespective of the irrigation system used, the introduction of working instruments significantly reduced the IRP for both 7.5 Fr and 9.2 Fr DISS scopes. A longer time was required to collapse the pelvicalyceal system and regain the basal intrarenal pressure when working instruments were used. The thicker the diameter of the instrument, the greater the impact on flowrate, IRP, collapse of the system, and regain of the pressure was observed. The latter trends were less pronounced with the 9.2 Fr scope with a wider 5.1 Fr working channel. Conclusions: The 9.2 Fr DISS ureteroscope demonstrated higher irrigation flow rates and IRP, and shorter times to system collapse and recovery compared to the 7.5 Fr scope. However, the insertion of working instruments negatively affected all measured parameters, with a greater impact observed in the 7.5 Fr scope due to its narrower channel.

Indexed as

basketdirect in-scope suctionintrarenal pressurelasersingle-use flexible ureteroscopysuction

Identifiers

PMID41322466
PMCPMC12663821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.