ArticleCentral European journal of urology2025
Measurement and comparison of intrarenal pressures during retrograde intrarenal surgery using novel flexible ureteroscopes with integrated direct in-scope suction: An experimental
Article in Central European journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Suction irrigation pressure autoregulating systems (SIPS): Is this the future of endourology?Central European journal of urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To evaluate the intrarenal pressure parameters of the 9.2 Fr (5.1 Fr working channel) and 7.5 Fr (3.6 Fr working channel) flexible ureteroscopes with direct-in-scope suction (DISS) in an Material and methods: We performed an experimental study using an Results: Higher IRPs were documented when the 9.2 Fr flexible ureteroscope was used compared to the 7.5 Fr scope, regardless of the irrigation setup. The highest IRP (45 mmHg) was documented with the 9.2 Fr scope, using manual pump irrigation and intermittent pumping with no suction. In contrast, the lowest IRP was reported with the 7.5 Fr scope and the automated pump at 40 mmHg. The pressure difference following 1second of suctioning was more pronounced with 9.2 Fr compared to 7.5 Fr. The 9.2 Fr ureteroscope with the 5.1 Fr working channel resulted in significantly shorter time to regain the initial IRP. Conclusions: For the first time in experimental studies we noted that irrigation through a wider 5.1 Fr working channel raises the baseline IRP faster than the classic 3.6 Fr working channel. Although these findings should be further investigated in a clinical setting, they should be taken into consideration to select the optimal strategy, to keep IRP at safe levels, and avoid complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.