Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41322449›Full record

ArticleCentral European journal of urology2025

The clinical utility of urolithiasis morphology assessment for perioperative stone composition determination.

Wojciech Tomczak, Katarzyna Grunwald, Klaudia Molik, Joanna Chorbińska, Łukasz Nowak, Jan Łaszkiewicz, Patryk Patrzałek, Mikołaj Przydacz, Magdalena Krajewska, Bartosz Małkiewicz and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Central European journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Wojciech TomczakUniversity Centre of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Katarzyna GrunwaldUniversity Centre of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Klaudia MolikUniversity Centre of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Joanna ChorbińskaDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Centre of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Łukasz NowakDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Centre of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Jan ŁaszkiewiczUniversity Centre of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Patryk PatrzałekUniversity Centre of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Mikołaj PrzydaczDepartment of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Magdalena KrajewskaDivision of Nephrology, Transplantology and Clinical Immunology at 4 Military Clinical Hospital in Wroclaw, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Poland.
Bartosz MałkiewiczDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Centre of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Tomasz SzydełkoUniversity Centre of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Wojciech KrajewskiDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Centre of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Urolithiasis is a highly prevalent disease influenced by a wide range of factors multifactorial etiology results in the formation of urinary stones with diverse mineral compositions. Accurate identification of stone constituents is crucial for effective prevention of recurrence. Gold-standard methods for stone analysis are not always readily available in clinical practice. To address this, Daudon proposed a morphological classification system aimed at identifying stone types based on their surface characteristics. However, existing literature reports suboptimal accuracy of this method, largely due to technical limitations of endoscopic equipment. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability of morphological assessment in predicting stone mineral composition. Secondary aims included the identification of factors contributing to the consistently poor accuracy reported in previous studies. Material and methods: An online quiz consisting of 20 single-choice questions was developed, each accompanied by a high-resolution image of a urinary stone and five predefined answer options. The reference stone composition for each image was determined using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. Participants' performance was evaluated based on the percentage of correct responses per individual and per question. The results of specialists and residents were compared using the two-proportion Z-test, with statistical significance set at p <0.05. Results: A total of 779 responses were collected, with an overall accuracy rate of 33.7%. The most commonly selected answers were respectively oxalates, phosphates, uric acid, cystine, and infectious stones. Subgroup analysis revealed accuracy rates of 36% among attending physicians and 32% among residents, with no statistically significant difference. Notably, two participants achieved a perfect score (100%), supporting the internal validity of the test. Conclusions: Detailed analysis revealed a wide distribution of scores, ranging from participants with only one correct response to those who completed the quiz with full accuracy. These results suggest that the consistently low diagnostic accuracy reported in the literature is more likely due to limited familiarity and lack of experience with the morphological classification, rather than inherent shortcomings of the system itself. The findings highlight the need for comprehensive endourology training programs focused on improving stone morphology recognition skills.

Indexed as

kidney stonesstone compositionstone morphologyurolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID41322449
PMCPMC12663811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.