ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Mepolizumab for hypereosinophilic syndrome: effectiveness and safety from real-world evidence.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- ICC/WHO-Defined and NGS-Annotated Idiopathic Hypereosinophilia (iHES/iHE): Mutations, Clinical and Treatment Details, and Predictors of Survival.American journal of hematology · 2026Article
- Hypereosinophilic syndrome and cerebral watershed infarction.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) is a rare condition characterized by elevated eosinophil levels and related symptoms of eosinophil-mediated organ damage. We reviewed the effectiveness and safety of mepolizumab for the treatment of HES. A scoping review was conducted following the PRISMA Scoping Reviews Checklist to identify real-world evidence of mepolizumab use in HES. In total, 36 references were identified as relevant and selected for review. Overall, 105 patients previously treated with glucocorticoids received mepolizumab at different dosages (range: 100-750 mg), routes of administration (subcutaneous/intravenous), and schedules (every 2-12 weeks). Remission rates were 57.1-76.0%. Most studies reported a range of 71.4-99.1% reduction in mean blood eosinophil counts with mepolizumab treatment. In addition, a glucocorticoid-sparing effect was observed; 85.7% of patients discontinued glucocorticoids after 12 months of mepolizumab administration. Mepolizumab was considered safe and well-tolerated and severe adverse events were rare. Mepolizumab provided clinically significant benefits in patients with HES in a real-world setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.