Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41322417›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025

Mepolizumab for hypereosinophilic syndrome: effectiveness and safety from real-world evidence.

Elvira Mora, María Laura Fox, Angelina Lemes, Beatriz Velasco, Jesús María Hernández-Rivas

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elvira MoraHospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
María Laura FoxDepartment of Hematology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Experimental Hematology, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.
Angelina LemesDepartment of Hematology, University Hospital of Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Beatriz VelascoSpecialty Care Medical Department, GSK, Madrid, Spain.
Jesús María Hernández-RivasDepartment of Medicine, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) is a rare condition characterized by elevated eosinophil levels and related symptoms of eosinophil-mediated organ damage. We reviewed the effectiveness and safety of mepolizumab for the treatment of HES. A scoping review was conducted following the PRISMA Scoping Reviews Checklist to identify real-world evidence of mepolizumab use in HES. In total, 36 references were identified as relevant and selected for review. Overall, 105 patients previously treated with glucocorticoids received mepolizumab at different dosages (range: 100-750 mg), routes of administration (subcutaneous/intravenous), and schedules (every 2-12 weeks). Remission rates were 57.1-76.0%. Most studies reported a range of 71.4-99.1% reduction in mean blood eosinophil counts with mepolizumab treatment. In addition, a glucocorticoid-sparing effect was observed; 85.7% of patients discontinued glucocorticoids after 12 months of mepolizumab administration. Mepolizumab was considered safe and well-tolerated and severe adverse events were rare. Mepolizumab provided clinically significant benefits in patients with HES in a real-world setting.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedHypereosinophilic SyndromeEosinophilsGlucocorticoidsHumansTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedGlucocorticoidsmepolizumabantibodieshumanizedhypereosinophilic syndromeinterleukin-5mepolizumabmonoclonaltreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID41322417
PMCPMC12660071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.