Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41322398›Full record

ArticleComputational and systems oncology2025

Optimization of Immune Checkpoint Blockade via a Multiscale Model System.

Anne M Talkington, Anthony J Kearsley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and systems oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anne M TalkingtonApplied and Computational Mathematics Division National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg Maryland USA.
Anthony J KearsleyApplied and Computational Mathematics Division National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg Maryland USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer progresses when cancer cells selectively bind to inhibitory receptors on a T cell surface, downregulating tumor immune response. One standard-of-care strategy to combat this process is immune checkpoint blockade. Immune checkpoint blockade occurs when a therapeutic agent binds to, and inhibits, inhibitory receptors on a T cell surface, such that immune stimulation is favored when T cells and cancer cells interact. However, many cancers fail to respond to immune checkpoint blockade treatments. Here we explore a whole-tumor and an individual cell-focused model system to test expected outcomes of blockade perturbations in tumor-immune interactions. We first observe a transition point at which patients become more likely to reach "remission" or "stable disease" as a terminal state, and a "progressive disease" state is less likely. We propose a physical, agent-based framework for testing blockade strategies at the cellular level. This offers valuable guidance for blockade efficacy optimization in future development and design of therapeutic antibodies.

Indexed as

agent‐based modeldynamical systemimmune checkpoint blockadeimmune exhaustion

Identifiers

PMID41322398
PMCPMC12663532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.