Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41322374›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2025

Evaluation of Risk Factor Screening Using the Ministry of Health's Scoring System for the Incidence of Early-Onset Preeclampsia in Primary Health Service.

Wilis Dwi Pangesti, Elsa Pudji Setiawati Sasongko, Adhi Pribadi, Dany Hilmanto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wilis Dwi PangestiDoctoral Program in Medical Sciences, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-5650-3817
Elsa Pudji Setiawati SasongkoDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia.ORCID 0009-0004-0631-5158
Adhi PribadiDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Padjadjaran University and Hasan Sadikin Hospital Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia.
Dany HilmantoDepartment of Pediatrics, Hasan Sadikin Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early onset preeclampsia (E) causes severe complications that lead to morbidity and mortality in women. Various screening methods have been implemented, including the Ministry of Health's scoring system and eoPEE prevention programs implemented in primary health care in Indonesia. Purpose: The objectives of this study were: 1) To determine the results of screening for eoPE risk factors using the Ministry of Health's scoring system, 2) To evaluate the accuracy of the Ministry of Health's scoring system in predicting the occurrence of eoPE. Patients and Methods: This prospective cohort design study was conducted from October 2021 to September 2022 in 38 primary health centers in Banyumas Regency, Central Java Province, Indonesia. A purposive sampling technique was utilized. The pregnant women with a gestational age of <20 weeks who were screened for eoPE risk factors using the Ministry of Health's scoring system at the first pregnancy visit were included as research participants. Data were processed using SPSS version 29, and a 95% confidence interval was used to determine the significance level. Results: The results revealed that 563 (13.9%) were classified as high risk for developing eoPE. The incidence of eoPE among those pregnancy screened was 2.5%. The most common maternal risk factors associated with eoPE were mean arterial pressure (24.8%), age ≥35 years (18.6%), and pre-pregnancy obesity (7.5%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the scoring system for eoPE were 52%, 87.1%, 9.6%, and 98.6%, respectively. Conclusion: It is concluded that the scoring performance test requires modification or other approaches to increase its sensitivity and positive predictive value. Modification of this system requires an approach that is easy, inexpensive, and feasible to be carried out in developing countries.

Indexed as

early-onset preeclampsiarisk factorsscoring systemscreening

Identifiers

PMID41322374
PMCPMC12661955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.