Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41322367›Full record

ReviewBMJ neurology open2025

Evaluation and treatment of refractory chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

Lynette Kiers, Belinda Cruse

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ neurology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lynette KiersNeurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Belinda CruseNeurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8383-1667

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is an inflammatory, immune-mediated neuropathy of the peripheral nerves and nerve roots. CIDP is unlikely to be a discrete disease entity, but rather a spectrum of related conditions, in which cell-mediated and humoral mechanisms act synergistically to cause damage to peripheral nerves. The 2021 guideline of the European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society on the diagnosis and treatment of CIDP has modified the CIDP spectrum to include typical CIDP and four well-defined CIDP variants. Patients with CIDP usually respond well to immunoglobulin therapy, steroids or plasmapheresis; however, 20-30% do not respond well, and approximately 15% remain refractory to all treatment modalities. Rituximab, mycophenolate mofetil and cyclophosphamide are of therapeutic benefit for some of these patients. Patients with some CIDP variants respond less well to immunotherapy, suggesting a difference in the pathogenic mechanisms underlying these variants. Potential novel treatments trialled in CIDP, targeting functionally relevant disease mechanisms, include neonatal Fc receptor blockers and complement inhibitors. These new treatment approaches are needed to optimise disease outcomes in refractory patients, and as an alternative for patients with suboptimal response requiring high doses or experiencing side effects from first-line therapies. Increasing the therapeutic options for patients with CIDP, particularly for refractory patients, highlights the need for more accurate diagnosis of typical CIDP and CIDP variants, objective evidence of treatment response and the need for reliable clinical biomarkers.

Indexed as

NEUROMUSCULAR

Identifiers

PMID41322367
PMCPMC12658512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.