Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41322347›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of behavioral development2025

Introduction to the special section on predictors and outcomes of peer victimization.

Claire F Garandeau, Sarah T Malamut, Lydia Laninga-Wijnen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of behavioral development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Claire F GarandeauUniversity of Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0395-020X
Sarah T MalamutUniversity of Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5907-2752
Lydia Laninga-WijnenUniversity of Turku, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The eight longitudinal studies published in this special section rely on data from five countries and on rigorous methodologies (such as genetically sensitive, multilevel, or experimental designs) to shed light on predictors and outcomes of peer victimization at school. This introduction highlights the main questions addressed by the current set of studies. First, we present studies which sought to identify the factors that a) put children and youth at higher risk of victimization by peers and b) exacerbate the effects of these vulnerability factors, as well as to determine whether genes account for some of these effects. Second, we present studies focusing on the links between peer victimization and later biological, psychological and social adjustment and on the possible moderators and mediators of these associations. Together, these studies help us better understand the maladaptive cycle of peer victimization, which can inform the development of school-based and targeted interventions.

Indexed as

academic self-efficacygenetic confoundingimplicit attitudesinternalizingparentingpeer statusPeer victimizationschool environmentsleep problems

Identifiers

PMID41322347
PMCPMC12664670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.