ArticleInterventional pain medicine2025
Rates of cervical spine surgery and repeat epidural injections after cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections for patients with cervical radiculopathy utilizing a large national database.
Article in Interventional pain medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections (CTFESI) are commonly performed to treat cervical radicular pain and decrease the need of surgery. The literature is mixed regarding the efficacy of CTFESI in obviating the need for cervical spine surgery. Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the rates of cervical spine surgery and spinal interventions after initial CTFESI for patients with radicular pain. Methods: TriNetX, a large national database, was queried from 2004 to 2025 for patients who underwent CTFESI for cervical radiculopathy. The rates of treatment progression after initial CTFESI were calculated. Treatment progression included: no additional treatment, repeat CTFEI, cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injection (CIESI), and cervical spine surgery. Cervical spine surgeries analyzed included anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF), foraminotomy, and total disc replacement (TDR). Treatment rates were also calculated for patients after a second CTFESI. Results: There were 28,345 patients who underwent CTFESI during this study period. After initial CTFESI, 57 % of patients did not undergo any additional procedures/surgeries, 23.7 % had a repeat CTFESI, 5.6 % received a CILESI, 7.4 % underwent ACDF, 1.6 % underwent a foraminotomy, and 1.8 % underwent a TDR. Together, after initial CTFESI, 10.8 % of patients went on to cervical spine surgery as a second line treatment. Of the 6,711 patients who received a repeat CTFESI, 74.5 % had no additional interventional treatment, 8.2 % underwent a CIESI, 10.6 % underwent ACDF, 2.5 % underwent a foraminotomy, and 2.2 % underwent a TDR. In total, 15.3 % of patients underwent cervical spine surgery after a second CTFESI. A third consecutive CTFESI was not attempted in any patients. Conclusion: This study demonstrates rates of surgery after an initial CTFESI and a repeat CTFEIS to be low.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.