ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2025
Evaluation of fracture resistance in a single rooted mandibular first premolar following access opening with AReneto
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Preservation of pericervical dentin (PCD) during access cavity preparation plays a critical role in maintaining the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Traditional access techniques, when providing visibility and canal access, often compromise structural integrity. The integration of guided endodontic systems offers a promising minimally invasive alternative. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the fracture resistance of mandibular first premolar following conventional access cavity preparation and augmented reality (AR)-assisted minimally invasive access cavity preparation using the AReneto Materials and Methods: Three freshly extracted, intact mandibular premolars were chosen for the study. Sample 1 was kept as the control. Sample 2 was prepared using the conventional access cavity technique, while Sample 3 was prepared with AReneto Results: FEA revealed the highest displacement and stress concentration in Sample 2. Sample 3 demonstrated lower displacement and Sample 1 showed the least displacement. Conclusion: AR-assisted access preparation using the AReneto
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.