ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Case Report: Telitacicept for interstitial lung disease associated with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: an observational study.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the most common complication and the major cause of mortality among patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs). Currently, no recommended standard treatment for IIM-associated ILD. In this observational study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of telitacicept in treating IIM-associated ILD. Methods: We included 10 patients with IIM-associated ILD; of them, seven had antisynthetase syndrome-associated ILD, one had anti-MDA5 antibody-positive dermatomyositis (DM)-associated ILD, and 2 had DM-associated ILD. Four patients with severe ILD were treated with a combination of rituximab (RTX) (375 mg/m Result: Over the 24-week follow-up, glucocorticoid dosage was reduced to 5-10 mg/day and that of telitacicept treatment was increased to 160 mg every 2 weeks in all patients. These patients exhibited alleviation of rash, joint swelling and pain, muscle pain and weakness, and dyspnea. Compared with before treatment, the Manual Muscle Testing 8 score and PaO2/FiO2 ratio increased by 25.1% and 28.2% after treatment, respectively. Lung function also exhibited considerable improvements, with percentages of forced vital capacity and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide increasing by 20.4% and 30.2%, respectively. Posttreatment chest high-resolution computed tomography revealed significant improvements compared with baseline. Only one patient experienced a mild lung infection, and no further infections occurred after telitacicept dose was reduced. One patient was administered additional nintedanib for pulmonary fibrosis due to insufficient improvement in lung function. Conclusion: Telitacicept demonstrates substantial clinical efficacy in the treatment of IIM-associated ILD, accompanied by a low infection rate and a favorable safety profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.