ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Optimizing myopia prediction in children and adolescents using machine learning: a multi-factorial risk assessment model.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Refractive status, visual behaviour, and parental myopia in Portuguese schoolchildren and adolescents.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Myo-ODE: continuous-time trajectory reconstruction and risk prediction of high myopia via neural ordinary differential equations.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Most previous studies on myopia in children and adolescents have primarily focused on genetic and environmental factors. This study aimed to explore modifiable behavioral, sociodemographic, and psychological contributors to myopia and to evaluate the potential of machine learning (ML) models in identifying at-risk individuals. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in eight primary and secondary schools in a Chinese province between October and December 2023. The dataset was split into training and testing sets (7:3). LASSO regression identified potential predictors, followed by multivariate logistic regression to determine independent risk factors. Ten machine learning algorithms were used to build prediction models: logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), gradient boosting machine (GBM), neural network (NNET), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), random forest adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), LightGBM, and CatBoost. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, F1 score, specificity, sensitivity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used to interpret variable contributions in the best-performing model. Results: The study included 2,086 children and adolescents (mean age 9.8 ± 2.7 years; 50.5% female), with an overall myopia prevalence of 25.12%. Independent risk factors for myopia included parental myopia, only-child status, physical activity level, mother's education level, age, and physical activity behavior. Among all models, the LightGBM algorithm achieved the best predictive performance (AUC = 0.738, 95% CI: 0.709-0.767). SHAP analysis identified parental myopia, physical activity level, only-child status, and physical activity behavior as the most influential predictors. Conclusion: Although ML models showed limited predictive accuracy, they helped identify modifiable risk factors associated with childhood and adolescent myopia. These findings may inform the design of targeted prevention strategies and early behavioral interventions rather than serve as clinical diagnostic tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.