ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Diagnosis of isolated hepatic tuberculosis in an immunocompetent individual: a case report and review of misdiagnosed cases.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Hepatic tuberculosis is a rare disease entity even in endemic areas of Case presentation: A 44-year-old woman presented with complaints of abdominal pain for the past 2 months. The patient was diagnosed with a solitary hepatic tuberculosis abscess that was identified by abdominal CT and liver biopsy. The patient was started on anti-tuberculous therapy (isoniazid, rifampin, ethambutol, pyrazinamide). One month after diagnosis, an abdominal ultrasound showed the abscess had enlarged to approximately 4.4 cm × 3.4 cm, with heterogeneous echogenicity and internal septations. The patient subsequently went to a specialist hospital for further treatment. Telephone follow-up revealed that the patient continued anti-tuberculosis treatment, with symptoms gradually improving and essentially resolving after 6 months. Conclusion: Hepatic tuberculosis is relatively rare in clinical practice and can easily be misdiagnosed as hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinoma, leading to unnecessary surgery. Postoperative pathological examination confirms the diagnosis of hepatic tuberculosis. A solitary tuberculous liver abscess creates a clinical barrier for treating physicians. We summarized cases that have been misdiagnosed as tumors over the past 20 years. When encountering suspicious patients clinically, it is important to inquire in-depth about the history of tuberculosis and to perform an ultrasound-guided liver lesion biopsy for pathological examination as early as possible to achieve early diagnosis and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.