ArticleMolecular therapy. Oncology2025
Pre-clinical evaluation of a potent and effective Pin1-degrading agent in pancreatic cancer.
Article in Molecular therapy. Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The peptidyl-prolyl isomerase protein Pin1 has been shown to contribute to cancer onset, development, and progression by regulating the function and stability of oncogenes and tumor suppressors, both in cancer cells and surrounding stromal cells. Hence, it has long been sought as a possible therapeutic target in oncology. However, further validation of Pin1 as a suitable target for novel therapeutic strategies requires the development of potent and effective pharmacological inhibitors, which are currently scarce. Very recently, we reported novel covalent Pin1 inhibitors that, acting as molecular crowbars, destabilize the protein
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.