ArticlePOCUS journal2025
Giant Pyonephrosis Diagnosed Using POCUS in a Resource-Limited Setting.
Article in POCUS journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pyonephrosis is a severe complication of hydronephrosis and can lead to the destruction of the renal parenchyma, sepsis, shock, and death. The clinical presentation is nonspecific, and 15% of patients are asymptomatic on presentation. In resource-limited settings, where Computed Tomography (CT) imaging is not available, point of care ultrasound (POCUS) plays an important role in evaluating kidney diseases in the emergency department (ED). In this case, a 36-year-old man presented to the ED with dyspnea, fever, abdominal pain, and abdominal distention in the area where an intra-abdominal tumor was reported. After ultrasound-guided aspiration, pyonephrosis was diagnosed. In the absence of other capable specialists, the emergency physician performed a percutaneous nephrostomy procedure, and eight liters of pus were removed. The patient improved significantly and was discharged from the ED with oral antibiotics and scheduled urology follow-up in the clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.