ArticlePOCUS journal2025
Measurement of Systolic Blood Pressure Using POCUS With Color Doppler Compared to with an Intraarterial Line.
Article in POCUS journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In some clinical circumstances, it may be difficult to accurately measure systolic blood pressure (SBP) using direct auscultation technique or an automated oscillometric cuff pressure device. As an alternative method, this study compared the measurement of SBP using point of care ultrasound (POCUS) with color Doppler to the measurement of SBP using an intraarterial catheter. Methods: Study subjects were 50 patients in an intensive care unit who had an intraarterial catheter placed for monitoring blood pressure. The intraarterial catheter systolic pressure was recorded and compared to the contemporaneous measurement of SBP using POCUS with color power Doppler (CPD). The operator placed the Doppler sample volume over the brachial artery with ipsilateral inflation of a prepositioned upper arm blood pressure cuff that was inflated sufficiently to ablate blood flow in the target artery. The blood pressure cuff was then deflated until there was return of CPD signal in the brachial artery. At this moment, the corresponding blood pressure was noted on a sphygmomanometer attached to the blood pressure cuff. The values of the two methods were compared using standard statistical technique. Results: The intraarterial systolic pressures and CPD systolic pressures by POCUS were well correlated with a Pearsons correlation coefficient of 0.96. Bland-Altman analysis of bias and limits of agreement indicated that the POCUS with CPD measurement was sufficiently accurate to have clinical utility. Conclusions: The use of POCUS with CPD to measure SBP may have utility in situations where direct auscultation or automated oscillometeric cuff pressure measurements may be unreliable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.