ArticleDigital biomarkers
Development and Feasibility Assessment of a Multimodal Digital Health Technology for Remote Monitoring of Symptoms in Myasthenia Gravis.
Article in Digital biomarkers. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07224386 (Multi-Modal Monitoring of Disease Symptoms in Myasthenia Gravis), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multi-Modal Monitoring of Disease Symptoms in Myasthenia Gravis
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital assessment in myasthenia gravis: evidence, validation, and a proposed framework for autoimmune heterogeneity, remote monitoring, and clinical endpoints.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Development and Feasibility Assessment of a Multimodal Digital Health Technology for Remote Monitoring of Symptoms in Myasthenia Gravis.Digital biomarkersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a chronic autoimmune neuromuscular disease. Patients with MG are typically evaluated by neuromuscular experts through in-person neurologic examinations. These assessments are time-consuming, require significant disease expertise, and capture only a snapshot of disease. Methods: Given this need, we developed a multimodal digital health technology (DHT) called BioDigit MG, for monitoring MG symptoms and objectively measuring disease severity. BioDigit MG includes tablet-guided speech and video-based assessments, electronic patient-reported outcomes relevant to MG, and a wearable sensor to measure physical activity and posture during activities of daily living. Results: We assessed the feasibility and acceptability of BioDigit MG by conducting a clinical study with 20 participants with MG who used the DHT. During the study, a total of 219 speech tasks and 119 videos were collected by the DHT, achieving 100% reliability in data collection and transfer. To evaluate technology acceptance and usability, we conducted face-to-face interviews with the 20 MG patients and 5 expert clinicians. Participants found the DHT highly effective, easy to use, and well-suited to their needs. Efficient and reliable data transfer capabilities of BioDigit MG ensured that patient-generated data were promptly and securely delivered to healthcare providers. Conclusion: These feasibility findings demonstrate that BioDigit MG is capable of reliable multimodal data collection and is acceptable to both patients and clinicians, supporting its potential for use in future larger scale validation studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.