ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2025
Effect of anticoagulation on isolated traumatic brain injury mortality using TQIP database: a propensity score analysis stratified by head injury severity.
Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The impact of anticoagulation (AC) on traumatic brain injury (TBI) outcomes remains varied in the literature. Previous studies often relied on single-center data, small sample sizes, or lacked adjustments for key confounding variables. This study used the population-based Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database to analyze the effect of AC on isolated TBI mortality, hypothesizing that AC's impact varies with TBI severity. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 2020 to 2021 TQIP database. Patients with isolated TBI were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision codes. Exclusions included patients <18 years, penetrating trauma, and non-head injuries with Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score >3. The majority of patients taking AC were in their 50s and above; therefore, they were stratified into AC and non-AC cohorts. Propensity score analysis adjusted for age, gender, and head AIS, stratified by TBI severity (mild, moderate, severe). Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and neurosurgical intervention (NSI), including craniotomy and intracranial pressure monitoring. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata V.17.0, with significance at p<0.05. Results: Among 118,775 patients with isolated TBI, 96,802 were >50 years, with 26,444 (27%) taking AC. Unadjusted mortality was higher in the AC group (6%) compared with the non-AC group (3%; ∆3%, p<0.001). Adjusted mortality differences showed significant AC effects in mild (∆1.3%, 95% CI 1.04% to 1.57%, p<0.001) and moderate TBI (∆7.9%, 95% CI 4.46% to 11.43%, p<0.001), but not severe TBI (∆3.14%, 95% CI 0.07% to 7.04%, p=0.11). No significant AC effect on NSI was observed after adjustment. Discussion: Preinjury AC increases mortality in patients with isolated TBI, with the magnitude of its impact varying by TBI severity. Future studies should explore AC's influence on intracranial blood volume and progression to further elucidate its role in TBI outcomes. Level of evidence: Level 3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.