ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease2025
Congenital uterine anomalies and congenital heart disease: An underappreciated association?
Article in International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Congenital uterine anomalies (CUAs), also known as Müllerian duct anomalies, can have an impact on gynecological care, pre-pregnancy counseling, and obstetrical outcomes. Patients with congenital heart disease (CHD), particularly of higher complexity, often have extracardiac manifestations. The relationship between CUAs and CHD is not well-described in the currently available literature. Methods: A single center retrospective cohort study was performed of all patients born female with ICD-10 codes corresponding to congenital heart disease and a completed pelvic MRI or ultrasound. CT imaging was not included given the known shortcomings of CUA detection and classification with CT. CHD diagnoses were confirmed with echocardiography and were classified into "simple", "moderate", or "complex" per the 2018 ACHD guidelines. CUAs were categorized based on the 2021 American Society of Reproductive Medicine Guidelines for classification of Müllerian anomalies. Results: 197 patients met inclusion criteria. 33 (16.7 %) were found to have a CUA. 17 (20 %) patients with moderate or complex CHD had a CUA. Notable associations include VACTERL and partial anomalous pulmonary venous return. More complex CHD was associated with more complex CUA. Conclusions: Within the limitations of a single center retrospective study, our data suggests there is an underappreciated association between CUA and CHD that requires further prospective multicenter study to assess prevalence data. There may ultimately be a role for targeted screening for CUA in patients with CHD, particularly those with genetic syndromes or moderate or complex CHD who are considering pregnancy or gynecologic intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.