ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025
ADA: A decoding algorithm for temporally-variable brain responses.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Decoding mental contents from brain activity is a long-standing goal in theoretical neuroscience and neural engineering. While current methods perform well in tasks with externally timed events, such as perception or motor execution, decoding covert cognitive processes like imagery or memory recall remains challenging due to uncertainty in the timing of underlying neural dynamics. In these settings, neurophysiological responses are not reliably linked to observable behaviour and likely vary in latency across trials. This complicates the use of time-locked analysis techniques, which perform decoding time point by time point across trials, thus assuming consistent signal timing. This problem corresponds to an understudied class of supervised learning where input features may be effectively mislabelled and need to be aligned across cases. To address this, we present the Adaptive Decoding Algorithm (ADA), a nonparametric method based on a two-level prediction. First, we estimate, for each trial, the temporal window most likely to reflect task-relevant signals; second, we decode the test trials based on the selection of informative windows. Using controlled simulations as well as a model of memory recall based on real perception data, we show that ADA outperforms alternative methods that assume fixed temporal structure. These results provide evidence that explicitly accounting for trial-specific timing can substantially improve decoding performance when the timing of relevant neural activity is unknown.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.