Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41321931›Full record

ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2025

Evaluating large language models' performance in answering common questions on drug-induced liver injury.

Yinuo Dong, Zili Zhang, Yang Zhi, Xiaoyun Li, Tengyu Guo, Lanlan He, Shuran Zhao, Xueli Yang, Jieting Tang, Wei Zhong and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Multicenter Evaluation of Large Language Models Versus Hepatologists for Prognostic Prediction in Drug-Induced Liver Injury.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Article
  2. Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models for Breast Cancer Patient Education: A Comparative Study.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  3. [Research progress in the field of drug-induced liver injury in 2025].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Yinuo DongDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; NHC Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases; Shanghai Research Center of Fatty Liver Disease, Shanghai 200001, China.
Zili ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
Yang ZhiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; NHC Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases; Shanghai Research Center of Fatty Liver Disease, Shanghai 200001, China.
Xiaoyun LiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; NHC Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases; Shanghai Research Center of Fatty Liver Disease, Shanghai 200001, China.
Tengyu GuoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; NHC Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases; Shanghai Research Center of Fatty Liver Disease, Shanghai 200001, China.
Lanlan HeDepartment of Liver Diseases, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350025, China.
Shuran ZhaoTangqiao Community Health Service Center, Shanghai, China.
Xueli YangTangqiao Community Health Service Center, Shanghai, China.
Jieting TangDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; NHC Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases; Shanghai Research Center of Fatty Liver Disease, Shanghai 200001, China.
Wei ZhongDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; NHC Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases; Shanghai Research Center of Fatty Liver Disease, Shanghai 200001, China.
Qinghui NiuDepartment of Liver Diseases, Qingdao University Hospital, Qingdao, China.
Mingyang MaDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China.
Zuxiong HuangDepartment of Liver Diseases, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350025, China.
Yimin MaoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; NHC Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases; Shanghai Research Center of Fatty Liver Disease, Shanghai 200001, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & Aims: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a complex condition often linked to medication behaviors, with patient education having a crucial role in optimizing outcomes. Large language models (LLMs) could serve as promising tools for scalable patient support, but their utility remains unclear. This study systematically evaluated the capability of six popular open- and closed-source LLMs in addressing common DILI-related queries, focusing on patient-centered education. Methods: Twenty-eight frequently asked DILI questions were collected with input from hepatologists and patients (n = 15), and categorized into six clinical domains. Responses from six LLMs (GPT-4, GPT-3.5, Claude-2, Claude-1.3, Gemini, and LLaMA-3.1-405B) were anonymized, randomized, and independently evaluated by three hepatologists for accuracy, comprehensiveness, and safety. Additional analyses included automated readability assessment, domain-specific analysis, detailed expert-led error analysis, and direct comparison with physician responses. Results: LLaMA-3.1-405B achieved the highest performance across most domains, with mean accuracy, comprehensiveness, and safety scores of 8.18 ± 1.68, 3.86 ± 0.70, and 4.02 ± 0.84, respectively, significantly surpassing other models (Dunn's Conclusion: This study represents the first systematic evaluation of LLMs for DILI-focused patient education. High-performing, publicly accessible LLMs demonstrate the potential to deliver accurate, comprehensive, and safe health information, even surpassing physician responses. Impact and implications: DILI is a complex and multidisciplinary condition where patient understanding has a crucial role in management outcomes, yet educational resources remain scarce. By systematically evaluating six widely used LLMs, including both open- and closed-source models, this study provides new insights into the potential of artificial intelligence tools to enhance patient education and supplement clinical communication in hepatology. These findings are particularly important for physicians, patient educators, and healthcare policymakers seeking scalable and reliable strategies to support liver disease management. Although further refinement and clinical oversight are necessary to ensure content safety and accuracy, integrating LLM-based tools into patient education initiatives could offer a practical pathway to improve health literacy and engagement in real-world settings.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDrug-induced liver injuryEvaluationLarge language modelNatural language processingPatient education

Identifiers

PMID41321931
PMCPMC12657742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.