ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2025
Evaluating large language models' performance in answering common questions on drug-induced liver injury.
Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multicenter Evaluation of Large Language Models Versus Hepatologists for Prognostic Prediction in Drug-Induced Liver Injury.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models for Breast Cancer Patient Education: A Comparative Study.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
- [Research progress in the field of drug-induced liver injury in 2025].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026Review
- A comparative study of the performance of different large language models in the Chinese National Pharmacist Licensing Examination.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Confident but unsupported: auditing large language models against supplied evidence boundaries in drug-induced liver injury assessment.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & Aims: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a complex condition often linked to medication behaviors, with patient education having a crucial role in optimizing outcomes. Large language models (LLMs) could serve as promising tools for scalable patient support, but their utility remains unclear. This study systematically evaluated the capability of six popular open- and closed-source LLMs in addressing common DILI-related queries, focusing on patient-centered education. Methods: Twenty-eight frequently asked DILI questions were collected with input from hepatologists and patients (n = 15), and categorized into six clinical domains. Responses from six LLMs (GPT-4, GPT-3.5, Claude-2, Claude-1.3, Gemini, and LLaMA-3.1-405B) were anonymized, randomized, and independently evaluated by three hepatologists for accuracy, comprehensiveness, and safety. Additional analyses included automated readability assessment, domain-specific analysis, detailed expert-led error analysis, and direct comparison with physician responses. Results: LLaMA-3.1-405B achieved the highest performance across most domains, with mean accuracy, comprehensiveness, and safety scores of 8.18 ± 1.68, 3.86 ± 0.70, and 4.02 ± 0.84, respectively, significantly surpassing other models (Dunn's Conclusion: This study represents the first systematic evaluation of LLMs for DILI-focused patient education. High-performing, publicly accessible LLMs demonstrate the potential to deliver accurate, comprehensive, and safe health information, even surpassing physician responses. Impact and implications: DILI is a complex and multidisciplinary condition where patient understanding has a crucial role in management outcomes, yet educational resources remain scarce. By systematically evaluating six widely used LLMs, including both open- and closed-source models, this study provides new insights into the potential of artificial intelligence tools to enhance patient education and supplement clinical communication in hepatology. These findings are particularly important for physicians, patient educators, and healthcare policymakers seeking scalable and reliable strategies to support liver disease management. Although further refinement and clinical oversight are necessary to ensure content safety and accuracy, integrating LLM-based tools into patient education initiatives could offer a practical pathway to improve health literacy and engagement in real-world settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.