ReviewEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice2025
Cardiac magnetic resonance findings in mitochondrial disease: a guide for clinicians.
Review in European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-invasive biomarkers for diagnosis and monitoring of primary mitochondrial diseases.Journal of neurology · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mitochondrial myopathies are heritable conditions caused by genetic variations in mitochondrial DNA or nuclear DNA. These result in dysfunctional cellular oxidative phosphorylation and ATP production, affecting organs with high-energy requirements such as the heart, brain and skeletal muscle. Cardiac involvement is common affecting one third of patients and includes left ventricular hypertrophy, conduction disease, Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, and dilated cardiomyopathy. Due to the variability in the clinical presentation, a multiparametric approach incorporating clinical, biochemical, histological/histochemical and genetic criteria is required to make the diagnosis. Cardiologists should be aware of the clinical red flags and imaging findings and how to differentiate mitochondrial cardiomyopathy from other causes of left ventricular hypertrophy. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging is a highly sensitive tool for depicting myocardial abnormalities to aid in both the diagnosis of patients presenting with left ventricular hypertrophy, and in the assessment of cardiac involvement in patients with a known diagnosis of mitochondrial myopathy, as this is an independent predictor of morbidity and early mortality. The most common CMRI findings include increased maximal LV wall thickness and mass and non-ischaemic subepicardial and midwall LGE, most commonly affecting the basal inferolateral or lateral wall. Future studies should consider integrating late gadolinium enhancement imaging into risk prediction models to enhance stratification of major adverse cardiac events such as heart failure and arrhythmia. As our understanding of mitochondrial disease evolves, integrating advanced imaging with molecular diagnostics will be essential for early detection of disease, improved risk prediction and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.