ArticleClinical case reports2025
Right Internal Mammary Artery Perforation and Large Mediastinal Hematoma Formation as a Complication of Radial Access Coronary Angiography: A Case Report.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perforation of the right internal mammary artery (RIMA) is an extremely rare vascular complication associated with the transradial approach (TRA) to coronary angiography. A 75-year-old woman presented with weakness. ECG revealed atrial fibrillation with long pauses. Echocardiography showed severe left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (LVEF: 20%). During coronary angiography, an unintended passage of a hydrophilic wire into the RIMA caused tissue staining indicative of severe spasm without perforation. The patient was initially managed conservatively, but then she experienced a significant drop in hemoglobin. Subsequent CT angiography revealed a mediastinal hematoma. The patient was emergently transferred to the catheterization laboratory, where angiography confirmed RIMA perforation with dye extravasation. Despite the unsuccessful balloon tamponade, a 2.5 × 21 mm covered stent was deployed, successfully sealing the perforation. This case is distinctive as one of the very few reported RIMA perforations complicating TRA coronary angiography. It emphasizes the importance of vigilance even when early angiography shows no clear perforation and highlights covered stenting as a life-saving option when balloon tamponade is unsuccessful. Knowing the possible complications of the TRA, specifically during hydrophilic guidewire maneuvers, empowers us to recognize and manage these complications promptly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.