ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Prophylactic mesh reinforcement after open aortic aneurysm repair: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06762561 (Prophylactic Mesh Reinforcement After Open Aortic Aneurysm Repair), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prophylactic Mesh Reinforcement After Open Aortic Aneurysm Repair: a Retrospective Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Patients undergoing elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair via midline laparotomy are at significantly increased risk-up to threefold-of developing incisional hernias (IHs) compared to those treated for aorto-iliac occlusive disease using the same approach. Recent vascular surgery guidelines recommend prophylactic mesh reinforcement (PMR) during abdominal wall closure to reduce IH incidence. This study aims at evaluating the effectiveness of retromuscular PMR in preventing IH after open AAA repair and to assess related postoperative complications. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study including patients who underwent open AAA repair with retromuscular PMR at our institution. Data collection included patient demographics, operative details, and postoperative complications. Clinical examination, abdominal ultrasound, and quality of life (QoL) were routinely assessed to evaluate the presence of IH and patient-reported outcomes. The primary endpoint was the incidence of IH; secondary outcomes included fascial dehiscence, seromas, surgical site infections (SSI), hematomas, chronic pain, and mesh displacement. Descriptive statistics were used to report outcomes, and findings were compared with existing literature. Results: A total of 21 patients were included between 2019 and 2024 with a median follow-up of 32 months. IH occurred in 4 (19%) patients: three developed hernias after a re-laparotomy performed postoperatively with mesh incision and re-closure, and one hernia was detected on ultrasound without clinical symptoms. No cases of fascial dehiscence, seroma, or surgical site infection were reported, and nor was chronic pain or mesh displacement. QoL was well-preserved, with minimal functional limitations and an average general health score of 80%. Conclusions: Retromuscular PMR may reduce the incidence of IH after open AAA repair. Re-laparotomy appears to be a risk factor for hernia development. Although these results support current guideline recommendations, further data with larger cohorts are needed to confirm these findings. Registration number: Observational study NCT06762561 (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.