Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41321829›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2025

Advancing time-since-interval estimation for clandestine graves: a forensic ecogenomics perspective into burial and translocation timelines using massively parallel sequencing.

Cherene de Bruyn, Kirstie Scott, Heather Panter, Frederic Bezombes, Komang Ralebitso-Senior

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cherene de BruynForensic Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Kirstie ScottForensic Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Heather PanterForensic Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Frederic BezombesForensic Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Komang Ralebitso-SeniorForensic Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forensic taphonomy and entomology has focused on estimating the post-mortem interval (PMI), particularly for surface depositions, using human cadavers and other mammalian models by considering morphological changes of the body and insect activity during decomposition. The PMI is crucial in forensic investigations as it provides key information regarding the victim's identity, the circumstances of their death and can confirm or refute a suspect's alibi. Gravesoil microbial communities are a potential tool that can complement traditional approaches to detect and confirm the presence of human remains in clandestine burials, aiding forensic investigations. The estimation of the time-since-burial (post-burial interval; PBI), and the time-since-translocation (post-translocation interval; PTI), a new concept, have potential to aid clandestine grave location but have received relatively little attention in forensic ecology research. Advances in massively parallel sequencing (MPS) provide a high-throughput means to estimate PBI and PTI by characterising soil microbial communities in graves with remains, from early to skeletal stages of decomposition, or where remains have been intentionally removed from crime scenes and relocated. This review presents a perspective on the use of the soil microbiome as an indicator for post-mortem time-since-interval estimations, with specific focus on the PBI and PTI. In addition, it provides a framework, supported within forensic ecogenomics, on how the PBI and PTI can be used as a forensic tool complemented by MPS. The review highlights the need for further research to validate microbial community analysis across diverse biogeographical regions to enhance its precision and reliability as a forensic investigative tool. Such validation could potentially enhance the accuracy of post-burial and post-translocation interval estimations, ultimately improving methods for clandestine grave identification.

Indexed as

clandestine burialsforensic ecogenomicsmassively parallel sequencingpost-burial intervalpost-mortem intervalpost-translocation intervalsoil microbiometime-since-interval

Identifiers

PMID41321829
PMCPMC12660289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.