ArticleIJID regions2025
A cross-sectional survey of knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding antimicrobial resistance among Syrian health care professionals.
Article in IJID regions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A systematic review of antimicrobial resistance among World Health Organization Bacterial Priority Pathogens in Syria (2015-2025).IJID regions · 2026Article
- Exploring antibiotic knowledge and practices in a sample of damascus residents: a foundation for informed interventions and public health strategies.BMC public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a global challenge, especially in conflict-affected settings such as Syria, where health care infrastructure is compromised. This study assessed Syrian clinicians' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding AMR and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS). Methods: A two-phase online survey was conducted from June-July to October-November 2024 among physicians, pharmacists, dentists, and nurses across 11 Syrian governorates. Participants were recruited through professional networks, social media, and snowball sampling. Results: Of 1179 respondents, 54% were male and 56% were residents (doctors in training); 32% had over 5 years' experience. Most practiced medicine (78%), pharmacy (13%), or dentistry (8%). Awareness of AMR as a global (98%), national (93%), and local (67%) issue was high. Although 90% supported AMS, only 47% rated their hospital's program as effective. Most desired more education (94%) and favored local guidelines (83%). Prescribing confidence was strong for routine cases (63%), but lower for complex ones (40-45%). Concerns included drug quality (80%), cost (52%), and ineffectiveness (47%). Notably, 39% struggled to withhold antibiotics in viral cases. Conclusion: The survey reveals strong AMR awareness but significant gaps in AMS practice, microbiology access, and clinical guidance. Strengthening Syria's national AMR strategy is urgently needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.