ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2025
Relationship Between Complex Signal Identification and Non-Pulmonary Vein Foci.
Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation; however, recurrences often originate from non-pulmonary vein (non-PV) foci. The Complex Signal Identification (CSI) algorithm in CARTO 3 assigns electrogram-fractionation scores (0-10). This study evaluated the feasibility of CSI-assisted mapping for identifying non-PV triggers. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 23 consecutive patients undergoing first-time AF ablation between January and June 2024. After PVI, non-PV triggers were induced using isoproterenol and adenosine triphosphate (ATP). When ectopy was absent, rapid pacing during isoproterenol infusion followed by defibrillation was performed, and ATP testing was repeated. High-density CSI mapping was conducted during sinus rhythm or high right atrial pacing using system default settings, targeting atrial components after ventricular blanking. Results: A total of 33 non-PV foci were localized (20 left atrium [LA], 13 right atrium [RA]). The mean CSI scores of LA and RA foci were 9.0 ± 2.3 and 8.8 ± 2.7, respectively. ROC analysis showed an AUC of 0.917 for discriminating non-PV foci, with an optimal cutoff of 8.5 (sensitivity 87.9%, specificity 88.3%). At 12 months, arrhythmia-free survival was 82.4% under symptom-driven follow-up. Ablation was selectively performed at the earliest activation and adjacent high-CSI points, avoiding indiscriminate lesion delivery. Conclusions: CSI-assisted mapping provided practical, adjunctive guidance to provocation and activation mapping for non-PV focus localization. While apparent discrimination was promising, the 8.5 threshold remains exploratory. Larger multicenter studies with standardized CSI settings and systematic post-ablation assessment are warranted to validate these preliminary findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.