Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41321744›Full record

ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2025

Perceptions of community on the preference of cesarean section deliveries: A qualitative study in the state of Andhra Pradesh, India.

Nagendra Babu Gavvala, Janmejaya Samal, M Benson Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nagendra Babu GavvalaSRM School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur Campus, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India.
Janmejaya SamalSRM School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur Campus, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India.
M Benson ThomasSRM School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur Campus, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile C-sections save lives in complicated deliveries, their overuse poses significant health risks for mothers and infants, necessitating an understanding of the underlying factors influencing C-section delivery preferences. Concerns about the rising C-section rates, particularly in regions like MATERIALS AND

methodsA qualitative research design was employed using focus group discussions (FGDs) to gather insights from postnatal mothers and caregivers across four districts of

resultsThe study revealed a complex interplay of medical, systemic, and cultural factors shaping delivery preferences. Vaginal deliveries were preferred for their quicker recovery and fewer complications, with strong familial and societal advocacy for their benefits. However, fear of labor pain, prior traumatic experiences, and perceived safety concerns often led to a preference for C-sections. Additionally, systemic issues like financial incentives in private healthcare settings and rising elective C-sections for convenience or auspicious timing contributed to the trend.

conclusionThe study underscores the need for balanced, evidence-based practices to mitigate nonmedical drivers of high C-section rates. Promoting antenatal counseling, addressing maternal and familial anxieties, and strengthening institutional practices are critical to ensuring safe and informed childbirth decisions.

Indexed as

Cesarean sectioncommunitydeliveryobstetricparturitionperceptions

Identifiers

PMID41321744
PMCPMC12662577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.