ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2025
Developing a minimum data set for the musculoskeletal physical therapy registry.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and evaluation of the musculoskeletal physical therapy registry in Iran: a step toward enhanced evidence-based practice.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMusculoskeletal disorders are a common health challenge in developed and developing countries. Physical therapy interventions can help reduce musculoskeletal pain, treat musculoskeletal disorders, and enhance the quality of life in individuals. A comprehensive and valid minimum data set (MDS) can be useful for data gathering and decision-making. Therefore, the objective of this study was to develop the MDS for the musculoskeletal physical therapy registry. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at the Tehran University of Medical Sciences in 2023. Four phases were carried out to develop the MDS, including a systematic review, focus group discussions, content validity and reliability calculation, and the Delphi technique. A systematic review was conducted in five databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE, and Google Scholar databases) to identify registries and data elements. In addition, the Google search engine was also reviewed. In the second phase, a focus group discussion was used to classify the extracted data elements by contributing experts. In the third phase, content validity (content validity ratio [CVR] and content validity index [CVI]) and reliability (Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] value) were calculated. In the fourth phase, two rounds of the Delphi technique for validation of the MDS were held. Finally, a musculoskeletal physical therapy MDS was developed.
resultsIn the first phase, 23 eligible studies were included in the systematic review, and 138 related data elements were extracted. In the second phase, four data elements were removed, and 16 data elements were suggested by experts in the focus group discussions. In the third phase, the average CVR and CVI for the questionnaire were 0.92 and 0.98, respectively. In addition, Cronbach's alpha and ICC values were calculated to be 0.98 and 0.89, respectively. In the third phase, 145 data elements were developed during two rounds of the Delphi technique. The MDS was divided into administrative and clinical data categories with 42 and 103 elements, respectively. The administrative data contained demographic, health-care provider, admission, and discharge data, while the clinical data contained general and physical assessment data and outcome measurement tools.
conclusionThe proposed MDS can serve as a standardized tool for collecting uniform data across centers that provide physical therapy services. This MDS enables health-care providers, managers, and decision-makers to evaluate the effectiveness of physical therapy interventions, develop guidelines, assess the performance of physical therapists, and conduct clinical research, thereby enhancing the overall quality of physical therapy services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.